οὐθείς,οὐθέν, later form forοὐδείς, οὐδέν, found in Att. Inscrr. from 378 B.C. onwards along withοὐδείς, which it supersedes entirely from about 325 B.C. to 100 B.C. (forty examples ofθ, none ofδ); οὐθείςis in a majority in Ptolemaic papyri up to about 130 B.C., after whichοὐδείςbegins to be common, but does not prevail untili A. D.; the evidence of non- Att. Inscrr. is in general agreement with the foregoing; codd. of Th. , Antipho , And. , Lys. , and Hdt. never haveοὐθείς, but theθforms are freq. in those of Pl. , X. , Isoc. , D. , Hyp. , Arist. , and Thphr. , freq. as variants for theδforms; also in Hellenistic writers, Teles , Plb. , etc.; the frequency ofθforms in the uncials of LXX varies roughly according to the date (known or probable) of the translation of the book in question (though theδforms are in a large majority in the LXX as a whole); theθforms are rare in codd. of Str. and later writers.
οὐθείς
Gloss
οὐθείς , οὐθέν , later form for οὐδείς, οὐδέν , found in Att. Inscrr. from 378 B.C. onwards along with οὐδείς , which it supersedes entirely from about 325 B.C. to 100 B.C. (forty examples of θ , none