A. Ag. 1147 (lyr.), Th. 2.13 , al., Antipho 5.93 , And. 1.38 , Pl. Phlb. 60d , al., X. Mem. 1.2.32 , etc.:ἑοῖtwice in Hom. , Il. 13.495 , Od. 4.38 ;ἑοῖ αὐτῇused of the 1 pers., A.R. 3.99 : forϝίν, ἵν, v. ἵ : Boeot.
ἑί̈ν
Corinn. 36
: acc. ἕ
Il. 4.497
, al., Pi. O. 9.14 , enclit. ἑ
Il. 1.236
, al., never in Trag., Com., Th. , Hdt. , or X. , but found in Pl. Smp. 175a ,al.;ἑέtwice in Hom. , Il. 20.171 , 24.134 (perh. with elision in 14.162 , 17.551 );ἑas fem. pl., h.Ven. 267 ;ϝηέdub. in GDI 1267.23 (Pamphylia): for the formsσφε,μιν,νιν , ἵ, σφωέ, σφεῖς,v.sub vocc.
: later this reflex. sense is found only when the Pron. is used in a subordinate clause or construction (esp. acc. c.inf.) and refers to the subject of the principal Verb, e.g. προηγόρευε τοῖς Ἀθηναίοις . . ὅτι Ἀρχίδαμος μέν οἱ ξένος εἴη . . καὶ μηδεμίαν οἱ ὑποψίαν κατὰ ταῦτα γίγνεσθαι
Th. 2.13
.
2. οὗ ἕ οἷin combination withαὐτοῦ, αὐτόν, etc. forms a reflex. Pron. used without the foregoing restriction: in Hom. the two words are separate, e.g. πειρήθη δ' ἕο αὐτοῦ ἐν ἔντεσι δῖος Ἀχιλλεύς
Il. 19.384
, cf. 5.64 , al.: later they form one word, v. ἑαυτοῦ. [ὅς 'ϝ' ἄξει , i.e. with elision of'ϝέ, must be read or understood forὃς ἄξει, Il. 24.154 , in view ofὅς ς' ἄξειin l. 183 , and so prob. in 1.195 (cf. 208 ), 4.315 (ὥς 'ϝ'), 16.545 (μή 'ϝ'), Od. 5.135 (ἠδέ 'ϝ'): soἔνθα 'ϝ̔οἰ ἔσανis conjectured for ἔνθ' ἔσαν οἱ
Il. 6.289
(cf.ἔνθα οἱ
ἦσαν ὕες
Od. 15.556
), alsoἀμφὶ δέ 'ϝ̔οἰ ὄσσεin Il. 5.310 : the elided acc.ϝ'is prob. to be recognized in δὸς δέ ϝ' ἰν ἀνθρο̄́ποις δόξαν ἔχε̄ν ἀγαθ̔ά̓ν
IG 14.652
(Metapontum), rather thanϝιν.] (ἕfrom*swe,ἑέfrom*sewe, cogn. withὅς(Possess.) andἑός, qq. v.)