__4 sometimes opposed to to what might have been under other circumstances, as it is (or was), as the case stands (or stood), as a matter offact, ν. δ᾽ ὁ μὲν ὣς ἀπόλωλε [[ 8th c.BC: Odyssea Homerus Epicus “Odyssey” 1.166; εἰ μὲν ὑπώπτευον, οὐκ ἂν.. ἐποιούμην· ν. δὲ κτλ. 5th c.BC: Thucydides Historicus 4.126, compare 1.122, 3.113, 5th-6th c.BC: Plato Philosophus “Cratylus” 384b, 4th c.BC: Demosthenes Orator 18.195, etc. ] Refs 8th c.BC+]; καὶ ν. even so, [[ 5th-6th c.BC: Xenophon Historicus “Anabasis” 7.4.24, 7.7.17. ] Refs 5th c.BC+]
__5 coupled with other Particles, τὰ ν. γε [[ 5th c.BC: Sophocles Tragicus “Philoctetes” 245, etc.; ν. γε μάν 5th c.BC: Pindarus Lyricus “P.” 1.50 ] Refs 5th c.BC+]; ν. δή, see entry : with other expressions of Time, ν... σήμερον, ν. ἡμέρη ἥδε, [[ 8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 7.29, 13.828 ] Refs 8th c.BC+]; ν. ἤδη henceforth, [[ 5th c.BC: Sophocles Tragicus “Antigone” 801 ] Refs 5th c.BC+] (anapaest meter), etc.; ν... ἄρτι but now, [[ 5th-6th c.BC: Plato Philosophus “Cratylus” 396c. ] Refs 5th c.BC+]
__II.4 in questions, τίς ν.; τί ν.; who, what, why now? [[ 8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 5.373, 1.414, 4.31 ] Refs 8th c.BC+]; ἦ νυ..; [[ 8th c.BC: Odyssea Homerus Epicus “Odyssey” 6.125. [In signf. I always _perispomenon_ In signf. II _perispomenon_ except when short, Hdn.Gr. 2.39, +others; _enclitic_ when short, sometimes in codices, as 8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 23.485 (Papyrus in “AJP” 21.304, etc. ] Refs 8th c.BC+]; oxytone when ={δή}, Tyrannioap.Hdn.Gr.2.27; καθ᾽ ὁμαλισμόν or κατ᾽ ἔγκλισιν when=δή, [[Scholia 5th-6th c.BC: Aristophanes Comicus “Plutus” 414, Scholia 3rd c.BC: Apollonius Rhodius Epicus 1.664)] Refs 5th c.BC+]. In codices usually perispomenon in both senses, [[ 4th-5th c.BC: Aeschylus Tragicus “Prometheus Vinctus” 82, “Th.” 242, 246, 5th c.BC: Sophocles Tragicus “Antigone” 705, “El.” 324, 5th-6th c.BC: Aristophanes Comicus “Plutus” 414, “V.” 758, 922, etc. ] Refs 5th c.BC+]; even νῠν is written νῦν in codices vett. [[ 5th c.BC: Pindarus Lyricus ] Refs 5th c.BC+] passim, also in [[ 5th c.BC: Sophocles Tragicus “Ajax” 87, “Tr.” 92, etc. ] Refs 5th c.BC+]; hence νυν may frequently be restored where the sense requires it. The accent of τοίνῡ?~Xν perhaps shows that both νῠν and νῡν could be enclitic.—Position: in signf. I νῦν can occupy any position; in signf. II it prefers (like other enclitics, but also like{ἄν, δέ, γάρ}, etc.) the second place in the sentence, e.g. πρός νύν σε πατρός [[ 5th c.BC: Sophocles Tragicus “Philoctetes” 468, compare “OC” 1333; ἀπό νύν με λείπετ᾽ ἤδη [prev. author] “Ph.” 1177 (Lyric poetry); μετά νυν δός 5th c.BC: Euripides Tragicus “Supplices” 56 (Lyric poetry) ] Refs 5th c.BC+]; νυ (always enclitic) precedes other enclitics and allows only δέ to precede.] (Cf. Sanskrit nú, n[umacracute], nūnám, O[[ 5th c.BC: Euripides Tragicus ] Refs 5th c.BC+] nū 'now', etc.)