Results are being ranked across the section.
Free Resources
Search the Free Resources catalog.
hallowed, ὅσι-ος,α,ον, alsoος,ον Pl. Lg. 831d , D.H. 5.71 :— A. hallowed,i. e.sanctionedorallowed by the law of Godorof nature, δίκη Thgn. 132 ; θοῖναι A. Pr. 529 (lyr.) ; λουτρά S. Aj. 1405
sacred ὅσι-ος, α, ον, also ος, ον [[ 5th-6th c.BC: Plato Philosophus “Leges” 831d, 1st c.BC: Dionysius Halicarnassensis 5.71 ] Refs 5th c.BC+]:— hallowed, i. e. sanctioned or allowed by the law of Go
devoutly Included with: ὅσι-ος, α, ον, also ος, ον [[ 5th-6th c.BC: Plato Philosophus “Leges” 831d, 1st c.BC: Dionysius Halicarnassensis 5.71 ] Refs 5th c.BC+]:— hallowed, i. e. sanctioned or allowed
that ὅστις,ἥτις, ὅ τι(sts. writtenὅ, τιto dist. it fromὅτι, A. that): Hom. has also the masc. collat. form ὅτις Od. 1.47 , al. (also in Critias 2.9 and Ion. and Arc. Prose, Jahresh. 12.136 (Erythra
when, at the time when ὅτε, also Cypr.,Inscr.Cypr. 135.1 H., Dor. ὅκα, Aeol. ὄτα(qq. v.), Relat.Adv., formed from the Relat. stemὁ-andτε(v.τεB), answering to demonstr.τότεand interrog.πότε; prop. of
when ὅτε, also [[ 5th c.AD: Cypria, “Inscription Cyprian dialect” 135.1] Refs 5th c.AD+] H., Doric dialect ὅκα, Aeolic dialect ὄτα (which see), Relat. adverb, formed from the Relat. stem ὁ- and τε (s
fact οὐ, the negative of A. factandstatement, asμήofwillandthought;οὐdenies,μήrejects;οὐis absolute,μήrelative;οὐobjective,μήsubjective. —The same differences hold for all compds. ofοὐandμή, and some
no οὐ, the negative of fact and statement, as μή of will and thought; οὐ denies, μή rejects; οὐ is absolute, μή relative; οὐ objective, μή subjective. —The same differences hold for all compounds of
on the contrary . . not οὐ μὲν οὖνorοὐμενοῦν, A. on the contrary . . not. . , introducing a neg. statement in contradiction or correction of a preceding statement or suggestion, Ar. Pl. 870 , Ra. 556
surely not οὐ μή, in independent sentences, is used either in Denial or in Prohibition: __I in Denial, __I.1 with subjunctive, __I.1.a chiefly of aorist, οὔ τι μὴ ληφθῶ δόλῳ [[ 4th-5th c.BC: Aesch
never οὐ μή, in independent sentences, is used either in Denial or in Prohibition: __I in Denial, __I.1 with subjunctive, __I.1.a chiefly of aorist, οὔ τι μὴ ληφθῶ δόλῳ [[ 4th-5th c.BC: Aeschylus
οὐ μή, in independent sentences, is used either in Denial or in Prohibition: in Denial, with subj. , chiefly of aor. , οὔ τι μὴ ληφθῶ δόλῳ A. Th. 38 , cf. 199 , 282 , Ch. 895 ; οὔ τοί ς' Ἀχαιῶν . . μή
but not οὐδέ, neg. Particle, related toμηδέasοὐtoμή, partly Conj., partlyAdv.: A. CONJUNCTION,but not, mostly answering toμέν(sts. written divisim), Il. 5.138 , 24.418 ; withoutμέν, 5.21 , etc.: sts.
nor οὐδέ, negative Particle, related to μηδέ as οὐ to μή, partly conjunction, partly adverb: __A CONJUNCTION, but not, mostly answering to μέν (sometimes written divisim), [[ 8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus
neither Related to: οὐδέ, negative Particle, related to μηδέ as οὐ to μή, partly conjunction, partly adverb: __A CONJUNCTION, but not, mostly answering to μέν (sometimes written divisim), [[ 8th c.B
οὐκοῦν , Dor. οὐκῶν , Adv. , composed, like οὔκουν , of οὐκ and οὖν , but differing in meaning and accent, cf. A.D. Conj. 257.18s qq., Hdn.Gr. 1.516 , Phryn. PS p.98B. in questions, inviting assent to
so οὐκοῦν, Doric dialect οὐκῶν, adverb, composed, like{οὔκουν}, of οὐκ and οὖν, but differing in meaning and accent,[[compare 2nd c.AD: Apollonius Dyscolus Grammaticus “de Conjunctionibus;” 257.18s q
certainly not, at any rate . . not οὔκουν, Ion. οὔκων,Adv., (οὐκ, οὖν): I. in direct negation,certainly not, at any rate . . not, freq. with stress on the word which followsοὖν, οὔκουν Ἀτρεῖδαι τοῦτ
not yet οὔπωorοὔ πω, Ion. οὔκω,Adv. A. not yet, opp.οὐκέτι(no longer, no more), usu. withpres.or past (esp.pf., oraor.inpf.sense) tenses, Il. 2.799 , Od. 13.335 , Hes. Op. 521 , Sc. 10 , Pl. Prt. 3
not yet οὔπω or οὔ πω, Ionic dialect οὔκω, adverb not yet, opposed to οὐκέτι (no longer, no more), usually with present or past (especially perfect, or aorist in perfect sense) tenses, [[ 8th c.BC: I
not! Included with: οὐ, the negative of fact and statement, as μή of will and thought; οὐ denies, μή rejects; οὐ is absolute, μή relative; οὐ objective, μή subjective. —The same differences hold for
-IG ὀφείλ-ω,impf. ὤφειλον; Ep. ὀφέλλω(also Aeol. , IG 12(2).67.7 (Mytil.), and Arc. , ib. 5(2).343.27 (Orchom. Arc. ,iv B. C.)),impf. ὤφελλονorὄφελλον,v.infr. II. 2 , 3 (the Att. or Ion. ὀφείλετ', ὄ
to owe ὀφείλ-ω, imperfect ὤφειλον; Epic dialect ὀφέλλω (also Aeolic dialect, [[ “IG” 12(2).67.7 (Mytil.), and 4th c.AD(?): Arcadius Grammaticus, [prev. work] 5(2).343.27 (Orchom. 4th c.AD(?): Arcadiu
I wish! Included with: ὀφείλ-ω, imperfect ὤφειλον; Epic dialect ὀφέλλω (also Aeolic dialect, [[ “IG” 12(2).67.7 (Mytil.), and 4th c.AD(?): Arcadius Grammaticus, [prev. work] 5(2).343.27 (Orchom. 4th